Results for 'Medical Safety'
Thakur, Sayanta & Lahiry, Sandeep
Accelerated drug approvals in oncology: Pros and cons
Clinical study, drug approval, medical oncology
The summary of the content highlights the success of the accelerated approval process, especially for oncology drugs. Key points include: The rise of accelerated approval processes is significant, particularly in oncology. The use of surrogate endpoints and their validation has been debated. Th…
Sep 14th • 4 mins read
Sean X Zhang, MSc , Dean Fergusson, PhD , Jonathan Kimmelman, PhD
Proportion of Patients in Phase I Oncology Trials Receiving Treatments That Are Ultimately Approved
cancer, biological markers, phase 1 clinical trials, drug approval, medical oncology, united states food and drug administration guidelines, adverse event, national comprehensive cancer network, American society of clinical oncology
Phase I oncology trials are often considered a therapeutic option, but this claim is primarily based on surrogate measures like objective response rates. A systematic search was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic value of phase I cancer trial participation, focusing on the likelihood of patien…
Apr 1st • 14 mins read
Ariadna Tibau, Consolación Molto, Alberto Ocana, Arnoud J Templeton, Luis P Del Carpio, Joseph C Del Paggio, Agustí Barnadas, Christopher M Booth, Eitan Amir
Magnitude of Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
antineoplastic agents, immunologic adjuvants, pharmaceutical adjuvants, phase 3 clinical trials, drug approval, drug labeling, medical oncology, united states food and drug administration, diagnosis, palliative care, surrogate endpoints, weight measureme
Regulatory agencies assess drug safety and efficacy, but thresholds may differ from those accepted by clinicians . Only 43.8% of RCTs for FDA-approved drugs meet the ESMO-MCBS threshold for meaningful benefit, reflecting potential softening of FDA standards. Encouraging trends include an increas…
Dec 13th • 7 mins read
Christopher A. Busch, MSC; Johannes Krisam, PhD; Meinhard Kieser, PhD
A Comprehensive Comparison of Additional Benefit Assessment Methods Applied by Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care and European Society for Medical Oncology for Time-to-Event Endpoints After Significant Phase III Trials—A Simulation Study
cancer drug trials, time-to-event endpoints, overall survival, added benefit assessment, IQWiG, hazard ratio thresholds
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) use different methods for assessing additional benefit in cancer therapies, with ESMO considering both relative and absolute benefits, while IQWiG focuses on the upper limit …
Jun 28th • 30 mins read
Gregory S. Calip, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Ivy P. Altomare, MD, Jenny S. Guadamuz, MSPH, PhD
Evaluating External Validity of Oncology Biosimilar Safety Studies
biologics, external validity, FDA, biosimilars, trastuzumab
Biologics are the fastest growing medication class in the US, significantly contributing to healthcare costs. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 created an abbreviated approval pathway to make biological products more accessible. A phase 3 randomized trial of SB3, a trast…
Apr 6th • 2 mins read
John Devin Peipert, PhD, Karen Kaiser, PhD, Sheetal Kircher, MD, George J. Greene, PhD, Sara Shaunfield, PhD, Katherina Hauner, PhD, David Cella, PhD, and Daniel K. Mroczek, PhD
Medical Oncologists’ Knowledge and Perspectives on the Use of Biosimilars in the United States
oncologist, biosimilars, ASCO, FDA, RSP
Most oncologists (88%) treated patients with biosimilars, and 63% reported that biosimilars were required at their institutions. Approximately half (52%) correctly identified that biosimilars are not the same as generic medicines. Common barriers to biosimilar use included concerns abou…
Jan 9th • 9 mins read
Emmanuelle Jacqueta, Ghania Kerouani-Lafayeb, Francoise Grudeb, Sergio Goncalvesb, Annie Lorenced, Florence Turcryb, Liora Brunelb, Laetitia Belgodereb, Adrien Monardc, Gaëlle Guyaderb, Lotfi Boudalib, Nicolas Albin
Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years
Innovation, Expanded access, Early drug access, Cancer, FDA, EMA
Cancer incidence is increasing globally, and while medical innovation significantly impacts patient survival, the drug development process is lengthy, often exceeding 10 years for marketing authorization (MA). France has implemented the ATU (Temporary Authorization for Use) program to facil…
Apr 7th • 12 mins read
Mateusz T. Wasylewski, Karolina Strzebonska, Magdalena Koperny, Maciej Polak, Jonathan Kimmelman, Marcin Waligora
Clinical development success rates and social value of pediatric Phase 1 trials in oncology
pediatric oncology, clinical development, trials, success rates
Pediatric Phase 1 trials in oncology aim to assess social value, focusing on rates of approval, transition to further phases, and citation in research. The study analyzed trials from 2004 to 2013, utilizing data from FDA, EMA, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and Google Scholar. …
Jun 21st • 28 mins read
S.E. Abdullah, E. Oflazoglu, J.C. Soria, M.M. Dar
New Realities of Phase I Clinical Trials in the Era of
durvalumab, durvalumab experience, clinical trials, immunotherapy
The development of cancer immunotherapy, particularly durvalumab, has progressed rapidly due to innovative strategies, such as novel study designs. Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, was developed by AstraZeneca starting in 2012, with initial trials leading to its accelerated appr…
Oct 7th • 5 mins read
Roman Adam, Ariadna Tibau, Consolación Molto Valiente, Boštjan Šeruga, Alberto Ocaña, Eitan Amir, Arnoud J. Templeton
Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010–2019
cancer drug approval, clinical benefit criteria, ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, OLUtool, Switzerland oncology drugs
The study evaluates the clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland between 2010 and 2019 using three different frameworks: ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, and OLUtool. A total of 48 drugs for 92 indications were assessed based on 100 studies, with each study evaluated according to the criteria …
Jun 10th • 35 mins read
Consolacion Molto, Ariadna Tibau, Aida Bujosa, Jose Carlos Tapia, Abhenil Mittal, Faris Tamimi & Eitan Amir
Association between control group therapy and magnitude of clinical benefit of cancer drugs
control group therapy, clinical benefit scales, ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, randomized trials
The study investigated the impact of control group therapy on various clinical benefit scales like ASCO-VF, ESMO-MCBS, NCCN Evidence Blocks, and ASCO-CRC. Researchers analyzed cancer drugs approved between 2012 and 2021 using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) listed on Drugs@FDA. Sig…
Dec 9th • 20 mins read
E Dawn Flick, Howard R Terebelo, Susan Fish, Amani Kitali, Vrinda Mahajan, Melissa Nifenecker, Kristen Sullivan, Paul Thaler, Sarah Ussery, David L Grinblatt
The Value of Pharmaceutical Industry-Sponsored Patient Registries in Oncology Clinical Research
registry, oncology, observational study, prospective cohort study, real-world evidence
Oncology patient registries are valuable for generating Real-World Evidence (RWE) due to: Prospective, primary data collection Characterizing smaller patient populations not typically included in clinical trials Providing insights into the rapidly changing disease course Allowing for longitudi…
Jun 7th • 8 mins read
Qiyou Wu, Zhiwei Lian, Xin Wang, Hanchao Cheng, Jing Sun, Hui Yu, Gong Zhang, Fan Wu, Jian Liu and Chuanben Chen
Factors associated with the uptake of biosimilars for breast cancer treatment from the perspectives of physicians and patients-Evidence from China
biosimilar, breast cancer, uptake, physician, patient
In 2021, the trastuzumab biosimilar entered clinical use in the research setting with less than 20% uptake in China, significantly lower than in the EU. Older patients are more likely to adopt biosimilars due to price sensitivity and financial concerns. Only 11.3% of patients switched from …
Jan 12th • 13 mins read
Gracy Crane, John C. W. Lim, Churn-Shiouh Gau, Jipan Xie & Laura Chu
The challenges and opportunities in using real-world data to drive advances in healthcare in East Asia: expert panel recommendations
Real-world data, real-world evidenc, East Asia, policy recommendations, decision-making support, East Asia, expert, RWD, RWE
Recommend approaches to improve the use of Real-World Evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making in East Asia and beyond. Encourage large-scale collaborations involving diverse stakeholders. Key stakeholders include government agencies, hospitals, research organizations, patient groups, and th…
Jun 28th • 13 mins read
Laurent Azoulay
Rationale, Strengths, and Limitations of Real-World Evidence in Oncology: A Canadian Review and Perspective
real-world evidence; RWE, real-world studies, RWS, oncology, real-world evidence, RWE, randomized controlled trial, RCT
Data obtained from real-world studies have an integral role in evidence-based medicine, serving as an essential source of safety information and a complement to efficacy data from RCTs. RWE is particularly useful for expanding the evidence base to encompass populations of patients who are not well r…
Apr 26th • 9 mins read
Envision Pharma Group
AI-powered real-world evidence: Strategically enhancing value and access
Oncology, Clinical Development, Targeted Therapy, Immunotherapy, Genomic Profiling, CAR-T Cell Therapy, Precision Medicine
Real-world evidence (RWE) complements traditional randomized controlled trials by providing insights from diverse data sources, helping healthcare decision-makers with coverage, reimbursement, and treatment guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) are pivotal…
Aug 22nd • 5 mins read