Join the Oncology Voice Network. Join for Free
Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010–2019
cancer drug approval clinical benefit criteria ESMO-MCBS ASCO-VF OLUtool Switzerland oncology drugs

Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010–2019


Share This Article


Summary

  • The study evaluates the clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland between 2010 and 2019 using three different frameworks: ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, and OLUtool.
  • A total of 48 drugs for 92 indications were assessed based on 100 studies, with each study evaluated according to the criteria set by ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, and OLUtool.
  • Only 39% of studies showed substantial clinical benefit according to ESMO-MCBS, 51% according to ASCO-VF, and 46% according to OLUtool.
  • There was fair concordance between ESMO-MCBS and ASCO-VF in the palliative setting and moderate concordance between ESMO-MCBS and OLUtool. However, there was no significant concordance between ASCO-VF and OLUtool.
  • Factors associated with substantial clinical benefit included HRQoL benefit reported as a secondary outcome for ESMO-MCBS and ASCO-VF, and blinded studies for OLUtool.
  • The study concludes that only around half of the trials supporting the marketing authorization of recent cancer drugs in Switzerland meet the criteria for substantial clinical benefit, with at best moderate agreement between the different grading systems.

Over time, the number of cancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has increased. This has been attributed to advances in cancer drug research but also to faster approvals which are often based on preliminary data and intermediate primary endpoints instead of overall survival (OS). While it is desirable to make treatments available on the market in a shorter time, this should not happen at the expense of effectiveness or safety of the approved substances and must therefore be approached with caution. There are concerns that faster drug approval may be associated with lower drug efficacy and worse patient safety, possibly also partly due to the high amount of approvals based on intermediate endpoints whose correlation to long-term outcomes like OS and Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was low in studies.

Effective treatments should prolong survival time and/or improve HRQoL. Previous studies have argued that certain cancer drugs approved by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) show questionable clinical benefit. In Switzerland, approval for new drugs is granted by the Swiss national authorisation and supervisory authority Swissmedic. In the authorisation process of medical products, Swissmedic takes into account pharmacological and clinical data on efficacy and safety as well as HRQoL. The price of a medicinal product is not assessed by Swissmedic and is determined after authorisation either by the authorisation holder or, in the case of an application for health insurance coverage, by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health.

Click for Source Download PDF version
cancer drug approval, clinical benefit criteria, ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, OLUtool, Switzerland oncology drugs

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Article
Value assessment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of esophageal and gastrointestinal cancers
OVN Avatar Shun-Long Ou, Jing Luo, Hua Wei, Xiao-Li, Qian Jiang

Value assessment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of esophageal and gastrointestinal cancers

Article
Value assessment of NMPA-approved new cancer drugs for solid cancer in China, 2016-2020
OVN Avatar Jing Luo, Shunlong Ou, Hua Wei, Xiaoli Qin, Rui Peng, Song Wang and Qian Jiang

Value assessment of NMPA-approved new cancer drugs for solid cancer in China, 2016-2020

Article
Value assessment of oncology drugs using a weighted criterion-based approach
OVN Avatar Doreen A. Ezeife MD, Francois Dionne PhD, Aline Fusco Fares MD, Ellen Laura Rose Cusano MD, Rouhi Fazelzad BSc, MISt, Wenzie Ng BSc, MPharm, RPh, Don Husereau BSc Pharm, MSc, Farzad Ali BPharm, MSc, Christina Sit MSc, Barry Stein B.Com BCL, LLB, Jennifer

Value assessment of oncology drugs using a weighted criterion-based approach

Article
Characterizing Exposure–Response Relationship for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in Immuno-Oncology and Beyond: Challenges, Perspectives, and Prospects
OVN Avatar Haiqing Isaac Dai, Yulia Vugmeyster, Naveen Mangal

Characterizing Exposure–Response Relationship for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in Immuno-Oncology and Beyond: Challenges, Perspectives, and Prospects

Article
Outcome measures for oncology alternative payment models: practical considerations and recommendations
OVN Avatar Jakub P. Hlávka, PhD, Pei-Jung Lin, PhD, Peter J. Neumann, ScD

Outcome measures for oncology alternative payment models: practical considerations and recommendations

Article
Leveraging existing data to contextualize phase II clinical trial findings in oncology
OVN Avatar E.M. Ray, L.A. Carey, K.E. Reeder-Hayes

Leveraging existing data to contextualize phase II clinical trial findings in oncology

Explore OVN