Results for 'clinical trial reporting'
B. Gyawali, E. G. E. de Vries, U. Dafni, T. Amaral, J. Barriuso, J. Bogaerts, A. Calles, G. Curigliano, C. Gomez-Roca, B. Kiesewetter, S. Oosting, A. Passaro, G. Pentheroudakis, M. Piccart, F. Roitberg, J. Tabernero, N. Tarazona, D. Trapani, R. Wester, G.
Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring
ESMO-MCBS, bias, clinical trial design, clinical trial implementation, clinical trial reporting, clinical trial analysis
The ESMO-MCBS is a tool used for scoring the clinical benefit of cancer medicines as reported in clinical trials, assuming valid research methodologies and quality implementation. The tool's effectiveness is compromised by studies with flawed design, implementation, or data analysis, w…
Apr 20th • 8 mins read
Jaques van Heerden, MD, Mohamed Zaghloul, MD, Anouk Neven, MSc, Teresa de Rojas, MD, PhD, Jennifer Geel, MD, Catherine Patte, MD, Joyce Balagadde-Kambugu, MD, Peter Hesseling, MD, Francine Tchintseme, MD, Eric Bouffet, MD, and Laila Hessissen, MD
Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trials and Collaborative Research in Africa: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives
pediatric oncology, clinical trials, research, Africa, collaborative research
Current childhood cancer survival rates in African countries range from 8.1% to 30.3%. The review focuses on pediatric oncology trials in Africa, highlighting challenges and suggesting research collaboration opportunities. Data were collected from the SIOP global mapping survey, ClinicalT…
Aug 7th • 10 mins read
Dylan V Neel, David S Shulman, Clement Ma, Florence Bourgeois, Steven G DuBois
Sponsorship of oncology clinical trials in the United States according to age of eligibility
clinical trials, industry, oncology, pediatric, sponsorship
The sponsorship mix of trials relevant to young people with cancer has not been well-documented, which may impact policies and regulations in pediatric cancer drug development. An analysis of interventional trials in the U.S. from 2007 to 2018 was conducted using the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, …
Apr 29th • 8 mins read
Kyle A. Dymanus BS, Mohit Butaney MBBS, Diana E. Magee MD, MPH, MSc, Amanda E. Hird MD, MSc, Amy N. Luckenbaugh MD, Merry W. Ma MD, PhD, Mary E. Hall MD, Heather L. Huelster MD, Aaron A. Laviana MD, MBA, Nancy B. Davis MD, Martha K. Terris MD, Zachary Kla
Assessment of gender representation in clinical trials leading to FDA approval for oncology therapeutics between 2014 and 2019: A systematic review-based cohort study
clinical trials, drug approval, health care disparities, medical oncology, sexism
Gender representation in oncology clinical trials varies by cancer type, with women often underrepresented compared to national cancer incidence. Despite FDA guidelines from June 2015 requiring consideration of biological variables like sex in research designs, disparities persist. Women continu…
Jun 23rd • 8 mins read
Dylan V. Neel, David S. Shulman, Clement Ma, Florence Bourgeois, Steven G. DuBois
Sponsorship of oncology clinical trials in the United States according to age of eligibility
clinical trials, sponsor, pediatric clinical trials, sponsorship
The analysis focuses on the sponsorship of interventional oncology trials for patients under 18 in the U.S. There are fewer industry-sponsored trials for pediatric oncology compared to adult trials and other pediatric disciplines. Industry-sponsored trials tend to be phase III, enroll more patie…
Apr 29th • 6 mins read
Pan Pantziarka, Ciska Verbaanderd & Lydie Meheus
Biased by design? Clinical trials and patient benefit in oncology
clinical trial design, drug development, drug registration, patient benefit, risks of bias
The study by Naci et al. raises numerous questions relating to the design characteristics, risks of bias and reporting of pivotal clinical trials in oncology. These findings add to the existing body of evidence that suggests drug development in oncology is not delivering the clinical benef…
Nov 27th • 3 mins read
Carina Dolan, PharmD, BCOP
Opportunities and challenges in biosimilar uptake in oncology
Trastuzumab, Rituximab, biosimiliar agents, emerging agents, cetuximab, bevacizumab, clinical trials, biosimiliars
The U.S. has 10 approved biosimilars, including 3 for oncology, with many more in development, potentially increasing access to expensive biologics. Acceptance by healthcare providers and patients requires extensive education, resolving concerns about immunogenicity, and ensuring interchangeability.…
Jun 26th • 7 mins read
Laura A. Levit, Raymond P. Perez, David C. Smith, Richard L. Schilsky, Daniel F. Hayes, and Julie M. Vose
Streamlining Adverse Events Reporting in Oncology: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Research Statement
oncology, research, reporting, adverse events, clinical trials
Monitoring patient safety during clinical trials is crucial to protect research participants and future patients. Under current regulations for investigational new drugs (INDs), sponsors must report certain serious adverse events (AEs) to the FDA and all participating investigators quickly.…
Feb 20th • 3 mins read
Meena N Murugappan, PharmD, MPH, PhD(c), Bellinda L King-Kallimanis, PhD, Gregory H Reaman, MD, Vishal Bhatnagar, MD, Erica G Horodniceanu, MPH, Najat Bouchkouj, MD, Paul G Kluetz, MD
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Cancer Registration Trials: A US Food and Drug Administration Perspective
cancer, pediatrics, product labeling, united states food and drug administration, childhood cancer, denosumab, surrogate endpoints, adverse event, patient self-report, pediatric oncology, selumetinib, benefit-risk assessment, tisagenlecleucel, statistica
PROs have been feasible to collect from patients as young as 7 years old and were included in trials from 2013 onward. PROs were used as exploratory endpoints in four product applications but not included in product labeling. To include PRO data in FDA labeling, early interaction with the FDA, c…
Apr 30th • 12 mins read
Omer Ben‐Aharon, Racheli Magnezi, Moshe Leshno, and Daniel A. Goldstein
Median Survival or Mean Survival: Which Measure Is the Most Appropriate for Patients, Physicians, and Policymakers?
Immunotherapies, Median survival, Mean survival, Weibull
The average Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST) for modern oncology agents approved by the FDA from 2013 to 2017 is 3.6 months, which is lower than the average median Overall Survival (OS) or Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of 4.6 months. When assuming a Weibull distribution post-trial, t…
Jul 18th • 15 mins read