Join to access to all OVN content. Join for Free
Median Survival or Mean Survival: Which Measure Is the Most Appropriate for Patients, Physicians, and Policymakers?
Immunotherapies Median survival Mean survival Weibull

Median Survival or Mean Survival: Which Measure Is the Most Appropriate for Patients, Physicians, and Policymakers?


Share This Article


Summary

  • The average Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST) for modern oncology agents approved by the FDA from 2013 to 2017 is 3.6 months, which is lower than the average median Overall Survival (OS) or Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of 4.6 months. When assuming a Weibull distribution post-trial, the average mean OS or PFS increases to 6.1 months.
  • Immuno-oncology agents show significant improvements in mean versus median survival, with an average mean survival of 6.9 months using the Weibull distribution, compared to an average median of 3.2 months. Median survival alone is insufficient to understand efficacy in these cases.
  • Biomarker-driven targeted therapies performed better across all survival measures, with median survival at 5.9 months, RMST at 4.6 months, and mean survival at 7.4 months.
  • VEGF-targeted therapies have poorer outcomes with median survival of 2.1 months, RMST of 2.0 months, and mean survival of 2.2 months.
  • The discrepancy between mean and median survival is most pronounced in immuno-oncology agents due to potential durable survival in a minority of patients. Mean survival captures long-term outcomes better than median survival.
  • Using mean survival as a complementary measure in reporting prospective trials can provide valuable insights, particularly for immuno-oncology agents, and help clinicians and payers understand long-term impacts and make informed decisions.
  • Recent value-based frameworks emphasize the need to understand the true benefit of innovative treatments, focusing on the tail of survival curves and potential durable survival in some patients.
  • The study highlights limitations, including the interpretation of RMST depending on trial cut-off times, uncertainty in survival extrapolation using Weibull distribution, and potential contamination of mean survival measures due to censoring.
  • Incorporating RMST alongside median survival in clinical trial reporting can offer more meaningful information for various stakeholders, although mean measures may be less significant for immuno-oncology agents compared to milestone reporting.
 

Understanding the efficacy of treatments is crucial for patients, physicians, and policymakers. Median survival, the most common measure used in the outcome reporting of oncology clinical trials, is easy to understand; however, it describes only a single time point. The interpretation of the hazard ratio is difficult, and its underlying statistical assumptions are not always met. The objective of this study was to evaluate alternative measures based on the mean benefit of novel oncology treatments.

Click for Source Download PDF version
Immunotherapies, Median survival, Mean survival, Weibull

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Article
Virtual Clinical Trials in Oncology-Overview, Challenges, Policy Considerations, and Future Directions
OVN Avatar Kushal T. Kadakia, MSc, Malke Asaad, MD, Erica Adlakha, MS, Michael J. Overman, MD, Cristina M. Checka, MD, and Anaeze C. Offodile II, MD, MPH

Virtual Clinical Trials in Oncology-Overview, Challenges, Policy Considerations, and Future Directions

Article
Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years
OVN Avatar Emmanuelle Jacqueta, Ghania Kerouani-Lafayeb, Francoise Grudeb, Sergio Goncalvesb, Annie Lorenced, Florence Turcryb, Liora Brunelb, Laetitia Belgodereb, Adrien Monardc, Gaëlle Guyaderb, Lotfi Boudalib, Nicolas Albin

Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years

Article
Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors: A Systematic Review
OVN Avatar Aaron S. Long, BS; Audrey D. Zhang, MD; Caitlin E. Meyer, MLIS; Alexander C. Egilman, BS; Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS; Joshua D. Wallach, PhD, MS

Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors: A Systematic Review

Article
Transforming oncology: Five frontiers driving progress in cancer care
Partner Avatar iNIZIO

Transforming oncology: Five frontiers driving progress in cancer care

Article
Virtual Oncology MSL Team Increases KOL Engagement by 120%
Partner Avatar iNIZIO

Virtual Oncology MSL Team Increases KOL Engagement by 120%

Article
Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis
OVN Avatar Jayson L. Parker, Sebnem S. Kuzulugil, Kirill Pereverzev, Stephen Mac, Gilberto Lopes, Zain Shah, Ashini Weerasinghe, Daniel Rubinger, Adam Falconi, Ayse Bener, Bora Caglayan, Rohan Tangri, Nicholas Mitsakakis

Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis

Explore OVN