Join the Oncology Voice Network. Join for Free
Opportunities and challenges in biosimilar uptake in oncology
Trastuzumab Rituximab biosimiliar agents emerging agents cetuximab bevacizumab clinical trials biosimiliars

Opportunities and challenges in biosimilar uptake in oncology


Share This Article


Summary

The U.S. has 10 approved biosimilars, including 3 for oncology, with many more in development, potentially increasing access to expensive biologics. Acceptance by healthcare providers and patients requires extensive education, resolving concerns about immunogenicity, and ensuring interchangeability. Financial incentives and clear cost information may be needed to drive biosimilar uptake. Despite legal challenges, the FDA has made significant progress in approving and developing biosimilars since 2015.

There are now 10 approved biosimilars in the United States, including 3 oncology drugs, and at least 16 others in late-stage development. The introduction of competition into the biologic space launches a new era in
the treatment of cancer, possibly increasing access to the extremely costly biologics. The most important and influential stakeholders for biosimilar acceptance and usage are healthcare providers, such as pharmacists and
physicians, as well as patients. Gaining their support requires extensive education, postmarketing pharmacovigilance, resolving concerns about immunogenicity, and allowing interchangeability and substitution.

Patients require education on the basic definition of biosimilars versus generic drugs, how biosimilars are tested and approved, costs, and availability of clinical trials. Meanwhile, payers may need to find ways to incentivize physicians to prescribe biosimilars over biologics, as well as to provide information on cost and quality directly to patients in order to drive uptake. Finally, legal challenges to approved and pending biosimilars have limited the market access of these agents.Since 2015, when the FDA approved the first biosimilar under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, 9 additional biosimilars have received agency approval, including 3 with an oncology indication. Although tbo-filgrastim was approved under the traditional drug approval pathway, many viewed this approval as an example of what biosimilars would look like in the United States following the first approved biosimilar in the European Union. By January 2018, at least 60 biosimilars were enrolled in the FDA’s biosimilar development program, with FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, reporting that the agency had received requests for meetings to discuss biosimilars for 27 distinct reference biologics.

 

Click for Source Download PDF version
Trastuzumab, Rituximab, biosimiliar agents, emerging agents, cetuximab, bevacizumab, clinical trials, biosimiliars,

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Podcast
Evolving Role of MSL Field Support for Clinical Trials
Partner Avatar MSL Talk: Tom Caravela, Khalil Ahmed

Evolving Role of MSL Field Support for Clinical Trials

Podcast
How and Why Medical Affairs Can Support Diversity in Clinical Trials
Partner Avatar MSL Talk: Tom Caravela, Brad Atkinson, Brian Wilson, Christina Wright

How and Why Medical Affairs Can Support Diversity in Clinical Trials

Article
Patient involvement: A must-have in medicine development, but is it being overlooked in a cost-constrained environment?
Partner Avatar Envision Pharma Group

Patient involvement: A must-have in medicine development, but is it being overlooked in a cost-constrained environment?

Article
Evaluating External Validity of Oncology Biosimilar Safety Studies
OVN Avatar Gregory S. Calip, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Ivy P. Altomare, MD, Jenny S. Guadamuz, MSPH, PhD

Evaluating External Validity of Oncology Biosimilar Safety Studies

Podcast
MSL Career Options: The transition from Field Medical to Medical Director
Partner Avatar MSL Talk: Tom Caravela, Josh Corriveau

MSL Career Options: The transition from Field Medical to Medical Director

Article
EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for hematological malignancies
OVN Avatar Barbara Kiesewetter , Nathan I Cherny, Nicolas Boissel, Francesco Cerisoli, Urania Dafni, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Paolo Ghia, Nicola Gökbuget, Verónica González-Calle, Brian Huntly, Ulrich Jäger, Nicola Jane Latino, Jean-Yves Douillard, Luca Malcovati, Ma

EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for hematological malignancies

Explore OVN