Join to access to all OVN content. Join for Free
The regulatory landscape of precision oncology laboratory medicine in the United States - Perspective on the past 5 years and considerations for future regulation
Oncology Regulation Testing LDTs FDA CLIA CMS

The regulatory landscape of precision oncology laboratory medicine in the United States - Perspective on the past 5 years and considerations for future regulation


Share This Article


Summary

  • The regulatory landscape for precision oncology in the United States is complex, involving multiple governmental agencies with varying jurisdictions.
  • Since 2014, several regulatory proposals have been introduced following the FDA's draft guidance on laboratory-developed tests.
  • There are ongoing discussions and proposals aimed at updating the regulatory environment for precision oncology laboratory tests.
  • These discussions emphasize the need to balance the risks, benefits, and costs of different regulatory approaches.
  • Evaluating the broader implications of test regulation is critical to ensure appropriate care for patients in challenging circumstances.
  • Although many claims support the need for additional regulation, its impact on patient care and all stakeholders has not been fully assessed.
  • Finding tools to enhance laboratory test quality can offer benefits without imposing a heavy regulatory burden.

The current state of laboratory test regulation in the United States (US) is complex and the prospect of changes in the current paradigm has been continually on the horizon since 2014. Briefly, clinical laboratories in the US are regulated under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA 0 88)[1] of the Public Health Services Act, which are administered by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). These regulations were put in place to improve the quality of the processes in clinical laboratories, but the regulations allow for organizations that have received certification from CMS to inspect laboratories as a deemed entity. This status allows deemed entities to place additional requirements in place, so long as the underlying CLIA requirements are met. CLIA regulations have a flexible framework that allows individual medical directors and laboratories to have some leeway in how the specific requirements are met, which allows for accommodation of unique population-, laboratory-, and test-level factors that can improve the overall quality of testing and allows for the development of tests by laboratory medicine practitioners within certain bounds. Testing kits that are manufactured and shipped across state lines are regulated by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) via the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 [2] to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938. The FDA has several review and approval pathways where the manufacturer submits documentation and data to the FDA for review, and if the data fulfill the FDA’s requirements, the test receives marketing authorization. Manufacturers can then sell their products to laboratories, who wish to perform that testing. Testing kits which are cleared or approved by the FDA are regulated under CLIA when they are performed in a certified laboratory. In addition, under the current structure, laboratories are expected to verify the performance of these products and, under CLIA, are allowed to modify them if deemed necessary by medical leadership. If a manufactured product is modified by the user laboratory, the test is considered a laboratory developed test, and such modifications are frequently made to improve assay performance, use the assay in a way different from the use claimed by the manufacturer (e.g. diagnostic instead of screening applications), or allow acceptance of additional sample types that were not submitted to the FDA for approval....

Click for Source Download PDF version
Oncology,Regulation,Testing,LDTs,FDA,CLIA,CMS

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Podcast
Recruiting for Impact: Inside the Oncology Talent Market
OVN Avatar Kirk Shepard

Recruiting for Impact: Inside the Oncology Talent Market

Podcast
More Moments, More Memories: A Family’s Legacy in Oncology
OVN Avatar Kirk Shepard

More Moments, More Memories: A Family’s Legacy in Oncology

Podcast
Navigating the Future of CDXs in Oncology
Partner Avatar Rebecca Previs

Navigating the Future of CDXs in Oncology

Podcast
How Mentorship Sparks Innovation: A Conversation with Dr. Wesley Yip
Partner Avatar Monty Pal

How Mentorship Sparks Innovation: A Conversation with Dr. Wesley Yip

Podcast
BONUS: The Future of Cancer Surgery: Innovations, AI and Remote Robotics
Partner Avatar Monty Pal

BONUS: The Future of Cancer Surgery: Innovations, AI and Remote Robotics

Podcast
The Authority Company | Breaking Silos in Oncology
OVN Avatar OVN Staff

The Authority Company | Breaking Silos in Oncology

Explore OVN