Results for 'clinical trial implementation'
B. Gyawali, E. G. E. de Vries, U. Dafni, T. Amaral, J. Barriuso, J. Bogaerts, A. Calles, G. Curigliano, C. Gomez-Roca, B. Kiesewetter, S. Oosting, A. Passaro, G. Pentheroudakis, M. Piccart, F. Roitberg, J. Tabernero, N. Tarazona, D. Trapani, R. Wester, G.
Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring
ESMO-MCBS, bias, clinical trial design, clinical trial implementation, clinical trial reporting, clinical trial analysis
The ESMO-MCBS is a tool used for scoring the clinical benefit of cancer medicines as reported in clinical trials, assuming valid research methodologies and quality implementation. The tool's effectiveness is compromised by studies with flawed design, implementation, or data analysis, w…
Apr 20th • 8 mins read
H. K. van Halteren, J. Bennouna, B.Brasiuniene, A.J. Cunquero Tomas, A.M. Garcia Trinidad, A. Indini, G. Liposits, B. Pellegrino, L. Popovic, A.Tan, R.Vidra & M.Strijbos
Twelve ESMO Congress 2022 breakthroughs: practicing oncologists' perceptions and potential application on presented data
ESMO Congress 2022, review, methodology, implementation
Background: At the ESMO Congress 2022, numerous clinical trial outcomes were presented, highlighting the importance of structuring data to weigh treatment burden against benefits. Materials and Methods: A narrative non-systematic review of 12 selected oral presentations was conducted, focusing…
Jan 10th • 12 mins read