Join to access to all OVN content. Join for Free
Use of Real-World Evidence to Support FDA Approval of Oncology Drugs
Food and Drug Administration oncology drug approval real-world data real-world evidence

Use of Real-World Evidence to Support FDA Approval of Oncology Drugs


Share This Article


Summary

Real-world evidence (RWE) has gained increased attention in recent years as a complement to traditional clinical trials. The use of RWE to establish the efficacy of oncology drugs for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval has not been described. In this paper, we review 5 recent examples where RWE was submitted in support of the FDA approvals of original or supplementary indications for oncology drugs.
 
To identify cases where RWE was used, we reviewed drug approval packages available at Drugs@FDA for oncology drugs approved between 2017 and 2019. Five cases were selected to present a broad overview of different types of RWE, different circumstances under which RWE has been used for regulatory approvals, and how FDA evaluated the data in each case. The type of RWE submitted, the indication, limitations identified by FDA reviewers, and the outcome of the submission are discussed.
 
RWE, particularly historical controls for rare or orphan indications, has been used to support both original and supplementary oncology drug approvals. Types of RWE included data from electronic health records, claims, post-marketing safety reports, retrospective medical record reviews, and expanded access studies. Small sample sizes, data quality, and methodological issues were among concerns cited by FDA reviewers.
 
By bridging the gap between the constraints of the trial setting and the realities of clinical practice, RWE can add value to a regulatory submission. These early examples provide insight into how regulators evaluated RWE submitted as evidence of efficacy for oncology drugs.

In December 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act (“Cures Act”) was signed into United States (US) law. The Cures Act, designed to improve the efficiency and speed of new medical product development and regulatory approval, mandated that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) establish a program to evaluate the potential use of real-world evidence (RWE) to support the approval of new indications for drugs, and to satisfy post-approval study requirements. The Framework for the FDA’s Real-World Evidence Program (“Framework”) was published in December 2018.
 
In this document, the FDA defines real-world data (RWD) as data related to patient health status or the delivery of healthcare that is routinely collected from a variety of sources, such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing reports, and registries, in addition to other sources such as mobile devices. RWE, derived from analysis of RWD, provides clinical insights with respect to the usage, benefits, or risks of a medical product...
Click for Source Download PDF version
Food and Drug Administration, oncology drug approval, real-world data, real-world evidence

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Podcast
Leveraging Real-World Evidence (RWE) in MSL Activities
Partner Avatar MSL Talk: Tom Caravela, Elizabeth Pash

Leveraging Real-World Evidence (RWE) in MSL Activities

Article
The Value of Pharmaceutical Industry-Sponsored Patient Registries in Oncology Clinical Research
OVN Avatar E Dawn Flick, Howard R Terebelo, Susan Fish, Amani Kitali, Vrinda Mahajan, Melissa Nifenecker, Kristen Sullivan, Paul Thaler, Sarah Ussery, David L Grinblatt

The Value of Pharmaceutical Industry-Sponsored Patient Registries in Oncology Clinical Research

Article
Defining the role of real-world data in cancer clinical research: The position of the
OVN Avatar Robbe Saesen, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Jan Bogaerts, Christopher M. Booth, Jan J. Cornelissen, Andre Dekker, Elizabeth A. Eisenhauer, André Freitas, Alessandro Gronchi, Miguel A. Hernán, Frank Hulstaert, Piet Ost, Petr Szturz, Helena M. Verkooijen, Michael W

Defining the role of real-world data in cancer clinical research: The position of the

Article
Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis
OVN Avatar Jayson L. Parker, Sebnem S. Kuzulugil, Kirill Pereverzev, Stephen Mac, Gilberto Lopes, Zain Shah, Ashini Weerasinghe, Daniel Rubinger, Adam Falconi, Ayse Bener, Bora Caglayan, Rohan Tangri, Nicholas Mitsakakis

Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis

Article
Assessment of Coverage in England of Cancer Drugs Qualifying for US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval
OVN Avatar Avi Cherla, MSc; Huseyin Naci, MHS, PhD; Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH; Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD; Elias Mossialos, MD, PhD

Assessment of Coverage in England of Cancer Drugs Qualifying for US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval

Article
Assessment of Food and Drug Administration- and European Medicines Agency-Approved Systemic Oncology Therapies and Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Quality of Life: A Systematic Review
OVN Avatar Vanessa Arciero, BS, Seanthel Delos Santos, Liza Koshy

Assessment of Food and Drug Administration- and European Medicines Agency-Approved Systemic Oncology Therapies and Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Quality of Life: A Systematic Review

Explore OVN