Join the Oncology Voice Network. Join for Free
Uptake of Oncology Biosimilars: Managed Care Strategies to Improve Value-Based Care Systems
biosimilars in oncology cost-effective cancer care healthcare education bioequivalence studies biosimilar adoption cancer treatment protocols

Uptake of Oncology Biosimilars: Managed Care Strategies to Improve Value-Based Care Systems


Share This Article


Summary

  • Biosimilars offer a cost-effective alternative in oncology, expanding access to cancer care, but their utilization is inconsistent due to varying perceptions and knowledge among stakeholders.
  • Increasing the adoption of biosimilars requires improved education and understanding among healthcare providers, pharmacists, and patients regarding their efficacy and safety.
  • Clinicians and managed care professionals should consider analytical studies, clinical efficacy, and cost reductions when integrating biosimilars into treatment protocols.
  • Real-world studies showing bioequivalence of oncology biosimilars support their efficacy and safety, aiding in their incorporation into clinical practice.
  • Successful adoption of biosimilars in oncology relies on overcoming legislative barriers, correcting misconceptions, and encouraging acceptance by patients, prescribers, and policymakers, with pharmacists playing a key role in education and advocacy.

In recent years, the cost of cancer care associated with biologics in the United States has increased at an alarming rate, causing some patients to be priced out of treatment. Biosimilars present important opportunities to lower healthcare costs and expand access to care for oncology patients. Oncology indications and supportive care are leading areas in which the use of biosimilars is rapidly expanding, but it is necessary that clinician and prescriber knowledge increase at the same rate. Multiple factors have caused delays in the incorporation of oncology biosimilars into clinical practice, spanning from legislative restrictions to poor acceptance and misconceptions about biosimilars' safety and efficacy, which ultimately influence their formulary placement, pricing, and contracting. With improved treatment protocols and therapeutic advances increasing survival rates of patients with cancer and necessitating extended treatment courses, the spotlight has never shone more directly on the importance of incorporating biosimilars into cancer treatment paradigms. Projections estimate that biosimilars will continue to drive price reductions through competition, both with reference agents and among other biosimilars. However, their success depends on consistent use, input from policymakers, and acceptance by patients and prescribers, providing key opportunities for pharmacists to emerge as leaders in biosimilar adoption and education.

Click for Source Download PDF version
biosimilars in oncology, cost-effective cancer care, healthcare education, bioequivalence studies, biosimilar adoption, cancer treatment protocols

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Podcast
MSL Career Options: The transition from Field Medical to Medical Director
Partner Avatar MSL Talk: Tom Caravela, Josh Corriveau

MSL Career Options: The transition from Field Medical to Medical Director

Article
EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for hematological malignancies
OVN Avatar Barbara Kiesewetter , Nathan I Cherny, Nicolas Boissel, Francesco Cerisoli, Urania Dafni, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Paolo Ghia, Nicola Gökbuget, Verónica González-Calle, Brian Huntly, Ulrich Jäger, Nicola Jane Latino, Jean-Yves Douillard, Luca Malcovati, Ma

EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for hematological malignancies

Article
Confounding factors in exposure–response analyses and mitigation strategies for monoclonal antibodies in oncology
OVN Avatar Sonoko Kawakatsu, René Bruno, Matts Kågedal, Chunze Li, Sandhya Girish, Amita Joshi, Benjamin Wu

Confounding factors in exposure–response analyses and mitigation strategies for monoclonal antibodies in oncology

Article
Model-Informed Therapeutic Dose Optimization Strategies for Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology: What Can We Learn From US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Antibody-Drug Conjugates?
OVN Avatar Michael Z. Liao, Dan Lu, Matts Kågedal, Dale Miles, Divya Samineni, Stephanie N. Liu, Chunze Li

Model-Informed Therapeutic Dose Optimization Strategies for Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology: What Can We Learn From US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Antibody-Drug Conjugates?

Article
External control arms in oncology: current use and future directions
OVN Avatar P.S. Mishra-Kalyani, L. Amiri Kordestani, D.R. Rivera, H. Singh, A. Ibrahim, R.A. DeClaro, Y. Shen, S. Tang, R. Sridhara, P.G. Kluetz, J. Concato, R. Pazdur, J.A. Beaver

External control arms in oncology: current use and future directions

Article
The First 2 Years of Biosimilar Epoetin for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in the U.S.: A Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions
OVN Avatar Charles L. Bennett , Sumimasa Nagai , Andrew C. Bennett , Shamia Hoque , Chadi Nabhan , Martin W. Schoen , William J. Hrushesky , Stefano Luminari , Paul Ray , Paul R. Yarnold , Bart Witherspoon , Josh Riente , Laura Bobolts , John Brusk , Rebecca Tombles

The First 2 Years of Biosimilar Epoetin for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in the U.S.: A Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions

Explore OVN