Join to access to all OVN content. Join for Free
Updated estimates of eligibility for and response to genome-targeted oncology drugs among US cancer patients, 2006-2020
genome-targeted therapy eligibility response

Updated estimates of eligibility for and response to genome-targeted oncology drugs among US cancer patients, 2006-2020


Share This Article


Summary

  • Recent studies have been conducted to update the estimates of eligibility and response rates to genome-targeted therapies among US cancer patients, reflecting data up to 2020.
  • The number of FDA-approved drugs targeting genetic indications has increased significantly since prior assessments.
  • Eligibility for genome-targeted therapies has risen from 5.13% in 2006 to 13.60% in 2020.
  • Response rates to these therapies have increased from 2.73% in 2006 to 7.04% in 2020.
  • The most significant growth in eligibility occurred after 2018, while response rate growth was more pronounced before 2018.

Precision oncology relies upon genomic sequencing of a patient’s tumor to determine optimal treatment. Precision therapies typically target genetic aberrations within cancer, and this approach has widespread enthusiasm driven by high response rates. Often, genomically-targeted drugs gain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in single-arm trials that lack a comparator group. As such, response rates, which measure the percentage of patients who have tumor shrinkage beyond the RECIST 1.1 cut-off of 30%, are often used as a study endpoint.
Prior studies have evaluated the percentage of US cancer patients with advanced or metastatic cancer who are eligible for and respond to this class of medications. Specifically, genome-targeted therapy was found to apply to 8.3% of US cancer patients as of 2018, and 4.9% might experience a partial or complete response. However, since that publication, the number of FDA approvals for drugs targeting genetic indications has grown rapidly. We therefore sought to update the estimates of both eligibility for and response to genome-targeted and genome-informed therapies for drugs that have been FDA-approved to reflect estimates as of 2020.
Click for Source Download PDF version
genome-targeted therapy, eligibility, response

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Article
Virtual Clinical Trials in Oncology-Overview, Challenges, Policy Considerations, and Future Directions
OVN Avatar Kushal T. Kadakia, MSc, Malke Asaad, MD, Erica Adlakha, MS, Michael J. Overman, MD, Cristina M. Checka, MD, and Anaeze C. Offodile II, MD, MPH

Virtual Clinical Trials in Oncology-Overview, Challenges, Policy Considerations, and Future Directions

Article
Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years
OVN Avatar Emmanuelle Jacqueta, Ghania Kerouani-Lafayeb, Francoise Grudeb, Sergio Goncalvesb, Annie Lorenced, Florence Turcryb, Liora Brunelb, Laetitia Belgodereb, Adrien Monardc, Gaëlle Guyaderb, Lotfi Boudalib, Nicolas Albin

Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years

Article
Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors: A Systematic Review
OVN Avatar Aaron S. Long, BS; Audrey D. Zhang, MD; Caitlin E. Meyer, MLIS; Alexander C. Egilman, BS; Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS; Joshua D. Wallach, PhD, MS

Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors: A Systematic Review

Article
Transforming oncology: Five frontiers driving progress in cancer care
Partner Avatar iNIZIO

Transforming oncology: Five frontiers driving progress in cancer care

Article
Virtual Oncology MSL Team Increases KOL Engagement by 120%
Partner Avatar iNIZIO

Virtual Oncology MSL Team Increases KOL Engagement by 120%

Article
Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis
OVN Avatar Jayson L. Parker, Sebnem S. Kuzulugil, Kirill Pereverzev, Stephen Mac, Gilberto Lopes, Zain Shah, Ashini Weerasinghe, Daniel Rubinger, Adam Falconi, Ayse Bener, Bora Caglayan, Rohan Tangri, Nicholas Mitsakakis

Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis

Explore OVN