Join the Oncology Voice Network. Join for Free
Timing of first-in-child trials of FDA-approved oncology drugs
pediatric cancer; phase 1 trials; drug development; targeted therapy; disparity

Timing of first-in-child trials of FDA-approved oncology drugs


Share This Article


Summary

 
  • Aim: To define the lag time between initial human studies and first-in-child clinical trials of oncology agents.
  • Methods: Systematic analysis of time from first-in-human trials to first-in-child trials for agents approved by the FDA from 1997 to 2017. Data was sourced from clinical trial registries, literature, and oncology abstracts.
  • Results:
    • 126 drugs received initial FDA approval for oncology indications between 1997 and 2017.
    • 117 non-hormonal agents were used in subsequent analyses.
    • 15 of 117 drugs (12.8%) did not have a pediatric trial.
    • 6 of 117 drugs (5.1%) had an initial approval that included children.
    • Median time from first-in-human to first-in-child trial: 6.5 years (range 0–27.7 years).
    • Median time from initial FDA approval to first-in-child trial: -0.66 years (range -43 to +19 years).
    • Time intervals were stable across different years of FDA approval, drug classes, and disease indications.

Progress in treating pediatric malignancies over the last forty years has largely been driven by advances in conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, surgery and radiation. While overall survival for children with cancer now exceeds 80%, outcomes remain poor for many patients. Further, treatment-related morbidity remains high for the majority of children treated with chemotherapy-based regimens. Our understanding of cancer genetics,
molecular drivers of disease and differences between adult and pediatric malignancies continues to grow. In spite of this greater understanding of pediatric cancer biology, few targeted therapies are approved by regulatory agencies for children with cancer.

Opportunities exist to spur pediatric drug development at the level of regulatory bodies, the pharmaceutical industry, and academic clinical investigators. While legislation such as the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) and Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) in the United States have attempted to mandate and incentivize pharmaceutical companies to develop drugs for children, new strategies are needed to accelerate evaluation of new drugs in children with cancer...

Click for Source Download PDF version
pediatric cancer; phase 1 trials; drug development; targeted therapy; disparity

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Article
The Oncology Data Network (ODN): Methodology, Challenges, and Achievements
OVN Avatar Ashley Woolmore , Dirk Arnold , Jean‐Yves Blay , Christian Buske , Alfredo Carrato , Winald Gerritsen , Marc Peeters , Jesus Garcia‐Foncillas , David Kerr

The Oncology Data Network (ODN): Methodology, Challenges, and Achievements

Article
Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs
OVN Avatar Alyson Haslam, PhD; Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH

Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs

Article
Loose Regulatory Standards Portend a New Era of Imprecision Oncology
OVN Avatar Ali Raza Khaki

Loose Regulatory Standards Portend a New Era of Imprecision Oncology

Article
Expert perspectives live from ASCO® 2025
Partner Avatar iNIZIO

Expert perspectives live from ASCO® 2025

Article
Where Did My Interview Go Wrong?
Partner Avatar Tom Caravela

Where Did My Interview Go Wrong?

Article
Tumor Growth Dynamic Modeling in Oncology Drug Development and Regulatory Approval: Past, Present, and Future Opportunities
OVN Avatar Nidal Al-Huniti, Yan Feng, Jingyu (Jerry) Yu, Zheng Lu, Mario Nagase, Diansong Zhou, Jennifer Sheng

Tumor Growth Dynamic Modeling in Oncology Drug Development and Regulatory Approval: Past, Present, and Future Opportunities

Explore OVN