Join the Oncology Voice Network. Join for Free
Timing of first-in-child trials of FDA-approved oncology drugs
pediatric cancer; phase 1 trials; drug development; targeted therapy; disparity

Timing of first-in-child trials of FDA-approved oncology drugs


Share This Article


Summary

 
  • Aim: To define the lag time between initial human studies and first-in-child clinical trials of oncology agents.
  • Methods: Systematic analysis of time from first-in-human trials to first-in-child trials for agents approved by the FDA from 1997 to 2017. Data was sourced from clinical trial registries, literature, and oncology abstracts.
  • Results:
    • 126 drugs received initial FDA approval for oncology indications between 1997 and 2017.
    • 117 non-hormonal agents were used in subsequent analyses.
    • 15 of 117 drugs (12.8%) did not have a pediatric trial.
    • 6 of 117 drugs (5.1%) had an initial approval that included children.
    • Median time from first-in-human to first-in-child trial: 6.5 years (range 0–27.7 years).
    • Median time from initial FDA approval to first-in-child trial: -0.66 years (range -43 to +19 years).
    • Time intervals were stable across different years of FDA approval, drug classes, and disease indications.

Progress in treating pediatric malignancies over the last forty years has largely been driven by advances in conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, surgery and radiation. While overall survival for children with cancer now exceeds 80%, outcomes remain poor for many patients. Further, treatment-related morbidity remains high for the majority of children treated with chemotherapy-based regimens. Our understanding of cancer genetics,
molecular drivers of disease and differences between adult and pediatric malignancies continues to grow. In spite of this greater understanding of pediatric cancer biology, few targeted therapies are approved by regulatory agencies for children with cancer.

Opportunities exist to spur pediatric drug development at the level of regulatory bodies, the pharmaceutical industry, and academic clinical investigators. While legislation such as the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) and Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) in the United States have attempted to mandate and incentivize pharmaceutical companies to develop drugs for children, new strategies are needed to accelerate evaluation of new drugs in children with cancer...

Click for Source
pediatric cancer; phase 1 trials; drug development; targeted therapy; disparity

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Article
EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for hematological malignancies
OVN Avatar Barbara Kiesewetter , Nathan I Cherny, Nicolas Boissel, Francesco Cerisoli, Urania Dafni, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Paolo Ghia, Nicola Gökbuget, Verónica González-Calle, Brian Huntly, Ulrich Jäger, Nicola Jane Latino, Jean-Yves Douillard, Luca Malcovati, Ma

EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for hematological malignancies

Article
Level of evidence used in recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines beyond Food and Drug Administration approvals
OVN Avatar R. Kurzrock, L.A. Gurski, R.W. Carlson, D.S. Ettinger, S.M. Horwitz, S.K. Kumar, L. Million, M. von Mehren, A.B. Benson III

Level of evidence used in recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines beyond Food and Drug Administration approvals

Article
The First 2 Years of Biosimilar Epoetin for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in the U.S.: A Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions
OVN Avatar Charles L. Bennett , Sumimasa Nagai , Andrew C. Bennett , Shamia Hoque , Chadi Nabhan , Martin W. Schoen , William J. Hrushesky , Stefano Luminari , Paul Ray , Paul R. Yarnold , Bart Witherspoon , Josh Riente , Laura Bobolts , John Brusk , Rebecca Tombles

The First 2 Years of Biosimilar Epoetin for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in the U.S.: A Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions

Article
Challenges and Opportunities in Dose Finding in Oncology and Immuno-oncology
OVN Avatar Yan Ji, Jin Y. Jin, David M. Hyman, Geoffrey Kim and Ajit Suri

Challenges and Opportunities in Dose Finding in Oncology and Immuno-oncology

Article
External control arms in oncology: current use and future directions
OVN Avatar P.S. Mishra-Kalyani, L. Amiri Kordestani, D.R. Rivera, H. Singh, A. Ibrahim, R.A. DeClaro, Y. Shen, S. Tang, R. Sridhara, P.G. Kluetz, J. Concato, R. Pazdur, J.A. Beaver

External control arms in oncology: current use and future directions

Article
Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs
OVN Avatar Alyson Haslam, PhD; Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH

Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs

Explore OVN