Join the Oncology Voice Network. Join for Free
Reverse Translation of US Food and Drug Administration Reviews of Oncology New Molecular Entities Approved in 2011-2017: Lessons Learned for Anticancer Drug Development
clinical pharmacology FDA reviews PMR PMC molecular entitites anticancer drug development

Reverse Translation of US Food and Drug Administration Reviews of Oncology New Molecular Entities Approved in 2011-2017: Lessons Learned for Anticancer Drug Development


Share This Article


Summary

The article discusses optimizing oncology drug development, focusing on the impact of pharmacokinetic factors like food effects and drug interactions. It recommends early evaluation of these factors to enhance dosing accuracy and patient compliance. Advanced modeling and simulation are suggested to improve dose selection and expedite drug approval with robust prescribing guidance.

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical pharmacology evaluations in initial submissions of 56 oncology new molecular entities approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between January 2011 and April 2017. Results from studies evaluating food effect, QTc prolongation, drug-drug interactions, renal and hepatic impairment effects, and dose optimization, as well as postmarketing requirements/commitments, were reviewed. This reverse translational research highlights the importance of clinical pharmacology and pharmacometrics in benefit-risk characterization, regulatory review, and labeling of anticancer therapeutics.

Click for Source Download PDF version
clinical pharmacology, FDA reviews, PMR, PMC, molecular entitites, anticancer drug development

Related Topics

Meet Our Innovation Partners

Loading partners...

You May Also Like

Article
Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology of T‐Cell Engaging Bispecifics: Current Perspectives and Opportunities
OVN Avatar Peter N Morcos, Junyi Li, Iraj Hosseini, Chi‐Chung Li

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology of T‐Cell Engaging Bispecifics: Current Perspectives and Opportunities

Article
Assessment of Whether the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology's Magnitude of Clinical Benefit
OVN Avatar Ronak Saluja, BS, Louis Everest, Sierra Cheng, Matthew Cheung, MD; Kelvin K. W. Chan, MD, MSc, PhD

Assessment of Whether the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology's Magnitude of Clinical Benefit

Article
Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors: A Systematic Review
OVN Avatar Aaron S. Long, BS; Audrey D. Zhang, MD; Caitlin E. Meyer, MLIS; Alexander C. Egilman, BS; Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS; Joshua D. Wallach, PhD, MS

Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors: A Systematic Review

Article
Transforming oncology: Five frontiers driving progress in cancer care
Partner Avatar iNIZIO

Transforming oncology: Five frontiers driving progress in cancer care

Article
Virtual Oncology MSL Team Increases KOL Engagement by 120%
Partner Avatar iNIZIO

Virtual Oncology MSL Team Increases KOL Engagement by 120%

Article
Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis
OVN Avatar Jayson L. Parker, Sebnem S. Kuzulugil, Kirill Pereverzev, Stephen Mac, Gilberto Lopes, Zain Shah, Ashini Weerasinghe, Daniel Rubinger, Adam Falconi, Ayse Bener, Bora Caglayan, Rohan Tangri, Nicholas Mitsakakis

Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis

Explore OVN