Clinical Advisory Board Member
pragmahealth.ai · New York metropolitan area, PA
CONTRACT
Posted Sep 9, 2026
Job Description
Company Description
Pragma is the recommendation layer for women's nutrition. Brand-agnostic. RD-built. Evidence-first. Most supplement guidance treats women as one population. We don't. Perimenopause, twenty years on the pill, six months postpartum, on a GLP-1. These are not the same body, and they should not get the same protocol. We don't manufacture or sell supplements. No brand relationship touches what we recommend. We're in early access and moving fast.
Role Description
We're building the Clinical Advisory Board for a product that is about to be in a lot of women's hands.
You'll review and validate clinical evidence before it reaches our recommendation engine. Our RD team does the first pass: screening the literature, drafting summaries, flagging what's worth your time. What reaches you is short, structured, and already filtered. You validate the evidence, pressure-test the clinical reasoning, and tell us where we're overstating what the research supports.
That last part is the job. You're paid for your review, not your approval.
Time: 2 to 10 hours per quarter. Asynchronous, with one optional quarterly call. Fully remote, anywhere in the US.
Compensation
$300/hour for MD and DO
$150/hour for NP and PA
$100/hour for RD/RDN
No equity, no advisor shares.
Why now
Women were excluded from most US clinical research until 1993. The nutrition literature still carries it. Protocols built substantially on men, applied to women, sold by an industry with no incentive to mention the gap.
We're a small team building fast to close that gap, and the clinical bar is set by the people on this board. You'll shape how the engine reasons about women's bodies while it's being built, not audit it afterward. Early enough to matter, structured enough to put on a CV.
Qualifications Required
- Active, unrestricted US license: MD, DO, NP, PA, or RD/RDN. Relevant PhD/PharmD considered.
- Depth in women's health, reproductive endocrinology, menopause and midlife medicine, clinical nutrition, or metabolic health
- Fluent in primary literature: study design, effect size, population applicability
- Willing to tell a founder your absolute clinical opinion based on evidence no matter what another's take is
Helpful
- Prior advisory board, IRB, guideline panel, or peer review experience
- Familiarity with supplement regulation
- Clinical experience with perimenopause, OCP use, postpartum, or GLP-1 patients
How to apply
https://airtable.com/appORxa1FupX80iZd/pagtFzVu7i56Efd5I/form
Five minutes. Credential, clinical area, resume, and one real question: Name a supplement recommendation commonly made to women that you don't think the evidence supports, and what you'd say instead.
Pragma is the recommendation layer for women's nutrition. Brand-agnostic. RD-built. Evidence-first. Most supplement guidance treats women as one population. We don't. Perimenopause, twenty years on the pill, six months postpartum, on a GLP-1. These are not the same body, and they should not get the same protocol. We don't manufacture or sell supplements. No brand relationship touches what we recommend. We're in early access and moving fast.
Role Description
We're building the Clinical Advisory Board for a product that is about to be in a lot of women's hands.
You'll review and validate clinical evidence before it reaches our recommendation engine. Our RD team does the first pass: screening the literature, drafting summaries, flagging what's worth your time. What reaches you is short, structured, and already filtered. You validate the evidence, pressure-test the clinical reasoning, and tell us where we're overstating what the research supports.
That last part is the job. You're paid for your review, not your approval.
Time: 2 to 10 hours per quarter. Asynchronous, with one optional quarterly call. Fully remote, anywhere in the US.
Compensation
$300/hour for MD and DO
$150/hour for NP and PA
$100/hour for RD/RDN
No equity, no advisor shares.
Why now
Women were excluded from most US clinical research until 1993. The nutrition literature still carries it. Protocols built substantially on men, applied to women, sold by an industry with no incentive to mention the gap.
We're a small team building fast to close that gap, and the clinical bar is set by the people on this board. You'll shape how the engine reasons about women's bodies while it's being built, not audit it afterward. Early enough to matter, structured enough to put on a CV.
Qualifications Required
- Active, unrestricted US license: MD, DO, NP, PA, or RD/RDN. Relevant PhD/PharmD considered.
- Depth in women's health, reproductive endocrinology, menopause and midlife medicine, clinical nutrition, or metabolic health
- Fluent in primary literature: study design, effect size, population applicability
- Willing to tell a founder your absolute clinical opinion based on evidence no matter what another's take is
Helpful
- Prior advisory board, IRB, guideline panel, or peer review experience
- Familiarity with supplement regulation
- Clinical experience with perimenopause, OCP use, postpartum, or GLP-1 patients
How to apply
https://airtable.com/appORxa1FupX80iZd/pagtFzVu7i56Efd5I/form
Five minutes. Credential, clinical area, resume, and one real question: Name a supplement recommendation commonly made to women that you don't think the evidence supports, and what you'd say instead.
Additional Details
- City
- New York metropolitan area
- State
- Pennsylvania
- Country
- US
Apply and matching require a free OVN account. Browse listings anytime without signing in.